Quantitative Scoring Engine v5.1 — 1 Ticker
| Ticker | Price | Verdict | Conviction | Score | Base Target | Upside | Fortress |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKLB | $88.77 | NO | 4/10 | 5.4 | $75 | -16% | Good |
Overall: ALL PASSED
| Gate | Detail |
|---|---|
| ✓ G1 Price Data | $88.77 |
| ✓ G2 Market Cap | Market Cap: $51.31B |
| ✓ G3 Price History | 252 trading days (min: 100) |
| ✓ G4 Options | Options available (12 expirations) |
| ✓ G5 Delisting | No delisting signals |
| Factor | Weight | Raw Value | Score (0–10) | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth | 25% | 35.7% MEASURED | 10.0 | 2.500 |
| Gross Margin | 15% | 34.4% [+9.2pp YoY] MEASURED | 4.2 | 0.636 |
| Operating Margin | 15% | -28.4% [+19.9pp YoY] MEASURED | 2.0 | 0.300 |
| Fcf Yield | 10% | -0.5% (growth adj) MEASURED | 2.5 | 0.246 |
| Roic | 15% | ROA=-8.2% (ROIC fallback) MEASURED | 0.0 | 0.000 |
| Debt Health | 10% | ND/EBITDA=N/A, ICR=-5.9x, CR=4.08 NO DATA | 4.5 | 0.445 |
| Earnings Trajectory | 10% | EPS(T)=-0.37, EPS(F)=0.05 MEASURED | 8.5 | 0.850 |
| 6/7 factors have data (86%) — No coverage penalty Pillar score: Raw: 4.98 → Adjusted: 4.98 | Composite contribution: 4.98 × 0.40 = 1.992 | 1.992 | |||
| Factor | Weight | Raw Value | Score (0–10) | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trend Alignment | 25% | above 50-DMA, above 200-DMA, golden cross, ADX=16 MEASURED | 8.5 | 2.125 |
| Mean Reversion | 25% | RSI=69 (getting hot), %B=101 (near upper band) MEASURED | 1.0 | 0.250 |
| Momentum | 20% | MACD above signal, histogram positive, ROC=30.5% (strong up) MEASURED | 8.2 | 1.640 |
| Positioning Sentiment | 20% | SI=4.3% (moderate), P/C=1.00 (neutral) MEASURED | 6.2 | 1.240 |
| Volume Confirmation | 10% | RVOL=0.6x MEASURED | 5.0 | 0.500 |
| 5/5 factors have data (100%) — No coverage penalty Pillar score: Raw: 5.75 → Adjusted: 5.75 | Composite contribution: 5.75 × 0.15 = 0.862 | 0.862 | |||
| Factor | Weight | Raw Value | Score (0–10) | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iv Richness | 35% | 90% MEASURED | 10.0 | 3.500 |
| Iv Vs Hv | 10% | IV/HV=0.95x MEASURED | 4.5 | 0.450 |
| Beta Gap Risk | 10% | 2.21 MEASURED | 8.0 | 0.800 |
| Gap History | 10% | Worst day: -12.6%, >5% drops: 30 MEASURED | 4.0 | 0.400 |
| Capital Outlay | 5% | $8,877 per 100 shares MEASURED | 9.0 | 0.450 |
| Entry Timing | 10% | LEAPS available MEASURED | 5.5 | 0.550 |
| Options Liquidity | 20% | near-term OI 3,508 (workable), LEAPS OI 66,568 (~639d, deep), spread 19% (moderate) MEASURED | 7.0 | 1.400 |
| IV Source: IBKR Live 7/7 factors have data (100%) — No coverage penalty Pillar score: Raw: 7.55 → Adjusted: 7.55 | Composite contribution: 7.55 × 0.30 = 2.265 | 2.265 | |||
| Factor | Weight | Raw Value | Score (0–10) | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward Pe | 30% | 1732.1x MEASURED | 1.5 | 0.450 |
| Peg Ratio | 20% | N/A NO DATA | 4.0 | 0.800 |
| Ev Ebitda | 20% | N/A NO DATA | 3.0 | 0.600 |
| Analyst Upside | 15% | -2.5% to $87 MEASURED | 3.1 | 0.469 |
| Ps Or Pb | 15% | P/B=28.02x MEASURED | 1.0 | 0.150 |
| 3/5 factors have data (60%) — Coverage penalty: -0.5 Pillar score: Raw: 2.47 → Adjusted: 1.97 (-0.50) | Composite contribution: 1.97 × 0.15 = 0.295 | 0.295 | |||
| Pillar | Score | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fundamentals (40%) | 4.98 | 40% | 1.992 |
| Technicals (15%) | 5.75 | 15% | 0.862 |
| Fortress Fit (30%) | 7.55 | 30% | 2.265 |
| Valuation (15%) | 1.97 | 15% | 0.295 |
| Composite Score | 5.42 | ||
| Field | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Price | 88.77 | yfinance/IBKR |
| Market Cap | $51.31B | yfinance |
| IV (IBKR) | 90.3% | IBKR live |
| IV (yfinance) | 95.4% | yfinance options |
| HV 30d | 95.3% | computed |
| Beta | 2.205 | yfinance |
| Revenue Growth | 35.7% | yfinance |
| Gross Margin | 34.4% | yfinance |
| Operating Margin | -28.4% | yfinance |
| FCF | $-270.7M | yfinance |
| ROE (ref) | -18.8% | yfinance |
| ROA (ref) | -8.2% | yfinance |
| Total Equity | N/A | yfinance |
| D/E Ratio | 15.39 | yfinance |
| Current Ratio | 4.08 | yfinance |
| EPS Trailing | -0.37 | yfinance |
| EPS Forward | 0.05 | yfinance |
| Earnings Growth | N/A | yfinance |
| Fwd P/E | 1732.10 | yfinance |
| PEG Ratio | N/A | yfinance |
| EV/EBITDA | -269.59 | yfinance |
| P/S Ratio | 85.27 | yfinance |
| P/B Ratio (ref) | 28.02 | yfinance |
| Analyst Target | $86.562 | yfinance |
| Near-term ATM OI | 3,508 | ~45d chain |
| LEAPS ATM OI | 66,568 | ~639d chain |
| Near-term Spread % | 18.7% | ~45d chain |
| Has LEAPS | Yes | yfinance |
| Next Earnings | 2026-05-08 | yfinance |
| Worst 1-Day Drop | -12.6% | price history |
| >5% Drop Days | 30 | price history |
| RSI 14 | 69.2 | computed |
| MACD | 4.13 | computed |
| ADX 14 | 16.10 | computed |
| Relative Volume | 0.63 | computed |
| 52W High | $99.58 | yfinance |
| 52W Low | $18.55 | yfinance |
| 1Y Return | +376.0% | yfinance |
The quantitative engine produces a NO verdict with 4/10 conviction for RKLB, driven primarily by extreme valuation concerns that overwhelm otherwise decent fundamentals and fortress characteristics. The composite 5.4/10 score reflects a company caught between strong operational momentum and stretched pricing. Fundamentals score a middling 5.0/10 despite impressive 35.7% revenue growth, as the company remains deeply unprofitable with negative operating margins and poor capital efficiency (ROA of -8.2%). The earnings trajectory factor scores well at 8.5/10, suggesting a path toward profitability with forward EPS turning positive at 0.05. However, the valuation pillar scores just 2.0/10, reflecting astronomical forward P/E of 1732x and P/B of 28x, with analyst targets actually below current levels at 87 versus the 88.77 current price. This creates a fundamental disconnect between growth potential and current pricing that the model flags as unsustainable over a 1-2 year horizon.
RKLB shows strong momentum characteristics with the stock trading above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages in a golden cross formation, contributing to the 8.5/10 trend alignment score. MACD remains bullish with positive histogram and 30.5% rate of change indicating powerful upward momentum (8.2/10 momentum score). However, mean reversion signals flash warning with RSI at 69.2 approaching overbought territory and Bollinger Band position at 101% indicating the stock is trading outside its upper band. The stock has gained 376% over the past year and sits near the top of its 52-week range of 18.55 to 99.58, with immediate resistance at the 99.58 high and support levels stepping down at 66.85, 63.98, and 58.41.
| Scenario | Price Target | Timeline | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bear | $55 | 6-12 | Valuation compression as growth investors rotate out of expensive names, potentially targeting the 58.41 support level or lower if momentum breaks. |
| Base | $75 | 12-18 | Gradual multiple compression toward more reasonable levels while maintaining growth trajectory, settling between key technical support zones. |
| Bull | $110 | 18-24 | Successful transition to profitability with margin expansion justifies premium valuation as space economy thesis plays out with contract wins. |
The primary risk is valuation compression from current stretched levels, particularly given the 1732x forward P/E multiple that leaves little room for execution missteps. With 30 days of greater than 5% drops historically and a worst single day of -12.6%, RKLB exhibits significant gap risk that could quickly erode capital. The company's high beta of 2.21 amplifies market volatility, while the transition from loss-making to profitable operations remains uncertain despite positive forward EPS projections. Current RSI levels near 69 and positioning outside Bollinger Bands suggest technical exhaustion that could trigger profit-taking.
Despite valuation concerns, RKLB scores a strong 7.5/10 for Fortress Fit, making it technically suitable for income-focused strategies. The 90% IV richness provides excellent premium collection opportunities, while the 8,877 capital outlay per 100 shares offers reasonable efficiency. LEAPS liquidity appears robust with 66,568 open interest extending roughly 639 days, though near-term options show more modest 3,508 OI with 19% spreads that are workable but not ideal. The high 2.21 beta creates substantial gap risk but also enhances premium collection potential for fortress structures.
Disclaimer: This report is auto-generated for informational purposes only. Verdicts and conviction scores are computed by a deterministic quantitative scoring engine (4-pillar model with hard gates). Narrative sections are generated by Anthropic Claude and may contain errors. Fundamental data from Yahoo Finance. IV data from IBKR (where available) or Yahoo Finance options. All data subject to delays. Options trading involves substantial risk. Always do your own due diligence.